Share |
You are here: Home About Us Oregon WildBlog Clear-cutting in the Gorge
Document Actions

Clear-cutting in the Gorge

Posted by Erik Fernandez at Jul 03, 2012 04:11 PM |

A new clear-cut in the Columbia River Gorge stirs controversy. The logging highlights Oregon's lax logging rules that allowed the Warm Springs and SDS Lumber to clear-cut right in the Columbia River Gorge.

Clear-cutting in the Gorge

Gorge clearcut with Mount Hood in the background. Photo by Darryl Lloyd

Have you seen the harsh new clear-cut scar in the Columbia River Gorge near Hood River?  Most of us like to think that the Columbia River Gorge is well protected, it is a National Scenic Area after all.  But it appears that a recent clear cut, the result of a collaboration between the Warm Springs Tribe and SDS Lumber, has resulted in an ugly scar on one of Oregon's most treasured landscapes.

 

The lands that were logged are a combination of tribal lands and SDS Lumber private lands. As you may be aware,  the rules for logging vary widely in the Northwest. If it's National Forest there are at least a few basic levels of protection, as well as requirements to conduct scientific analysis of the effects of logging, and to  let the public know what is happening.  Thanks to decades of hard work by Oregon Wild supporters and partners, clear-cutting is rare on National Forest lands.  But on private lands, the rules are not so strict, and clear-cutting is often the norm. 

The case of the fresh Columbia Gorge Scenic Area clear-cut highlights the need for private landowners to follow the rules, and treat our natural treasures with respect.  Stronger logging rules for state and private lands wouldn't hurt either.  Isn't it time for a ban on clear-cutting in the Pacific Northwest?

It would be a mistake.

Posted by Jim Gavin at Jul 09, 2012 10:29 AM
Let me start by saying that I logged in Oregon for the better part of 30 years, from Klamath Falls to Oakridge to Heppner.

I will be the first one to admit that clear cuts look terrible. However, I believe private property is exactly that, private.

Granted the property you are talking about here is in a senic area and that is an issue. I personally don't believe it is a good idea to use this as a basis for a ban in the entire PNW.

Blog Categories
BLM (19)
Beetles (4)
Bill's Excellent Adventures (9)
Biomass (1)
Bull Run (3)
Clean Water (26)
Columbia River Gorge (5)
Copper Salmon (4)
County funding (3)
Crater Lake (14)
Dams (15)
Devil's Staircase (5)
Donate (1)
Eastern Oregon (27)
Eastside Legislation (4)
Elk Creek (1)
Endangered Species Act (45)
Energy Development (3)
Eugene (12)
Eyes on the Agencies (5)
Fire (14)
Fish (6)
Flora (72)
Forest Monitoring (5)
Forest Service (41)
Fundraiser (8)
Global Warming (19)
Government (61)
Grazing & Livestock Industry (2)
Hikes & Outings (47)
Humor (2)
Hunting and Fishing (11)
Intern (1)
Klamath (32)
Klamath Basin (2)
Klamath River (2)
LNG (1)
Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge (1)
McKenzie (8)
Mining (7)
Model Projects (2)
Molalla River (1)
Mt Hood (14)
Mushrooms (34)
National Forest Management Act (3)
Northwest Oregon (3)
OHVs (3)
Old Growth (59)
Oregon Caves (2)
Oregon Coast (10)
Outdoor Recreation (41)
Partner Event (6)
Party (2)
Photo Contest (8)
Presentation (3)
Private land (1)
Report/Backgrounder (4)
Restoration (1)
Rivers (28)
Roadless (34)
Rogue (9)
Salmon (20)
Science (19)
Siskiyou Wild Rivers (22)
Siuslaw (5)
Snowshoe (2)
Soda Mountain (4)
Southern Oregon (16)
Spotted Owl (5)
State Forests (3)
Stewardship (4)
Sustainability (5)
Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge (1)
Upper Klamath Lake (1)
Video (1)
WOPR (10)
Waldo Lake (7)
Waters (31)
Wild & Scenic (9)
Wild Pacific Northwest (4)
Wilderness (52)
Wildlife (96)
Wolves (60)
Workshop (2)
home (17)
photo contest winners (1)
water (1)
 

powered by Plone | site by Groundwire