Share |
You are here: Home About Us Oregon WildBlog Going off the rails with the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
Document Actions

Going off the rails with the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation

Posted by Steve Pedery at Jan 10, 2012 04:54 PM |

A once-proud conservation organization seems to be turning its back on science and common sense.

Going off the rails with the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation

OR-10, a young female from the Walla Walla Pack

Gray wolves have a way of igniting fierce debates.  Working to promote wolf recovery in Wallowa County, we here at Oregon Wild are used to that.  However, even the most jaded Oregon Wild staffer wasn’t quite prepared for some outlandish comments made by Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF) President David Allen last week. 

 

 

They came in an article on wolf conflicts in Oregon that ran in several Oregon newspapers and other media outlets:

More wolves will simply mean a need for more management, said David Allen, president and CEO of the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, a nationwide group with 185,000 members. To keep wolf populations controlled, he said, states will have to hold hunts, shoot wolves from the air and gas their dens.

"Natural balance is a Walt Disney movie," he said. "It isn't real."

Pardon my bluntness, but under Allen the RMEF has gone off the rails.


Allen, who’s career includes stints in marketing for Wrangler blue jeans and NASCAR, took the wheel at RMEF in 2007.  The organization was once a respected voice for wildlife and public lands conservation, with a reputation for scientific integrity.  Historically, they took no position in battles over wolves, grizzlies, wolverine and other keystone species that are unpopular in some political circles.  However, under his leadership that has changed.  RMEF seems to believe that for species like wolves, which some in the hunting community do not like, science is irrelevant and extinction is ok.


That Allen disregards predator-prey relationships outlined in Biology 101 textbooks around the country, and views "natural balance" as a myth, isn't the worst of it.  Last year, RMEF turned their backs on decades of habitat conservation and endorsed reckless legislation in Congress that would have opened up over 60 million acres of pristine roadless lands to oil and gas development, logging, and mining.  Decades of research has show that roadless areas are incredibly important for elk, and Allen’s decision sparked an intense backlash by RMEF members.  Faced with an internal revolt, the organization later backtracked.

A bull elk in the Winema National Forest.  Photo by USFWS
Oregon Wild and RMEF share a common heritage.  Back in 1974, elk hunters concerned about the destruction of roadless areas were among Oregon Wild’s founders.  Even today, elk hunters are well-represented within Oregon Wild’s membership and staff.  That is why we find the positions being taken by RMEF, including the gassing of wolf pups in the den, to be so astounding. 


The overwhelming majority of hunters support conservation, and wish to see Americas wildlife heritage preserved.  It is too bad that Allen seems to ignore those moderate voices, focusing instead on the extreme few who view wolf recovery as a bad thing, but the destruction of prime elk habitat by oil and gas development as progress.

rmef and wolves

Posted by Clint Derr at Jan 13, 2012 10:44 AM
Being a member of the rocky mountain elk foundation, i and 185000 other members are in perfect agreement with mr. allen. If you have studied this issue as i have for 12 years now, you would know that in order to bring wolves under control, it is necessary to kill 70% of their total numbers each year and the following year that 70% will be back. If you will go back in history, you will find that 35 years of steady killing to make them go away. Only then will the ungulate herds make a comeback. I suggest that you folks read a time to cry wolf by lester j. mcCann. Then you will see how much junk science has been used to bring the wolf back and i might add for all the wrong reasons. Two of those reasons are the y to y and agenda 21. You pro wolfers had better be careful what you wish for as i can guarantee you are not going to like the results.

Agenda 21 - really?

Posted by Sean Stevens at Jan 13, 2012 10:54 AM
Mr. Derr,

Wolves were reintroduced not as some conspiracy of the Untied Nations, but because the American public (through the Endangered Species Act) demanded that our nation do something about our history of exterminating entire species from our landscape.

Wolves and elk (not to mention all of the other species that roam our wildlands) lived harmoniously for millenia before humans began exterminating both species. We had to enact laws to prevent more serious population declines of both species and we are lucky that we did. RMEF used to be a partner in sound wildlife conservation. Now, they seem more interested in fomenting the fear of the big, bad, wolf and in profiting off of a cultural divide that pits rural America against the big, bad government than in protecting wildlife and the habitat (like roadless areas) that they thrive in.

Wolves

Posted by Clint Derr at Jan 17, 2012 10:49 AM
Mr. Stevens, During the Clinton administration his interior secretary was Bruce Babbitt. He stated on public record that the western states will give him the 2 million acres that he asked for or the feds will take it .That 2 million acres is and has always been the yellowstone to yukon preditor corridor. He also stated for the record that he realized that under a republican congress that that was not attainable and that he no longer was going to do anything legislatively as the congress would not allow him to steal this land. Very shortly after this conversation took place, the canadian wolf was introduced to yellowstone park and central Idaho. It`s no secret that the wolf was put in here to make life miserable for cattle ranchers, big game hunting, gun control and a host of other things to come. In order to do this they had to steal 70 million dollars from the pittman roberts fund as the congress refused to fund this endeaver. They also went to another country to bring in an apex preditor and did not fill out the necessary 2177 papers to import these killers into our country. Not only did our federal gonernment say no to this endeaver, our state legislatures, our state fish and game commisions, our state fish and game departments, our state governors and the vast majority of the people of these states said no. The wolf was brought in anyway. And i might add that they were brought in as secretly as possible. When the first wolves were released in yellowstone park, Mike Phillips stood there as well as Bill Clinton and said, and i quote, now maybe we can get rid of 30000 ranchers in the northwest. I find it very hard to believe that there is not an agenda going on here. The wolf was put in here illegaly to grease the skids for the yellowstone to yukon preditor corridor. I appreciate your opinion of this very controversial issue and that is your right under the constituition of the United States of America. This is what makes America great but when one side pushes their views and takes action to force their views on the other side, and does so against the rule of law,that is a recipe for disaster. And that sir is what we have today with our ungulate herds in the western states. The endangered species act was and continues to be misused to facilatate an agenda against the American people.

The facts

Posted by Clint Derr at Jan 17, 2012 10:49 AM
Mr. Stevens, I didn`t think you would print my last reply as it told the truth and exposed the junk science used to introduce the canadian wolf into the US. If everybody would do their homework on this issue, people would see what is really going on. It`s this mans opinion that you do not want the environmental community to know the truth.

Conspiracy or saving a species?

Posted by Sean Stevens at Jan 17, 2012 10:53 AM
Clint,

Just got around to approving your comments on the website. We have to approve everything that gets posted because many folks tend to take these issues personally and then post personal insults or inappropriate material that we try and keep off our website.

I would respond to your post point by point, but it is clear that you don't have an interest in a dialogue that involves evidence for your opinion. So, I'll just agree with you and say that everyone is entitled to their opinions, but not everyone is entitled to their own set of facts.

Blog Categories
BLM (15)
Beetles (3)
Bill's Excellent Adventures (8)
Biomass (1)
Bull Run (3)
Clean Water (19)
Columbia River Gorge (4)
Copper Salmon (4)
County funding (1)
Crater Lake (12)
Dams (14)
Devil's Staircase (3)
Donate (1)
Eastern Oregon (23)
Eastside Legislation (3)
Endangered Species Act (38)
Energy Development (3)
Eugene (12)
Fire (11)
Fish (3)
Flora (57)
Forest Service (37)
Fundraiser (8)
Global Warming (19)
Government (55)
Hikes & Outings (43)
Humor (2)
Hunting and Fishing (8)
Klamath (30)
LNG (1)
McKenzie (7)
Mining (6)
Model Projects (2)
Mt Hood (14)
Mushrooms (34)
National Forest Management Act (2)
Northwest Oregon (3)
OHVs (2)
Old Growth (55)
Oregon Caves (1)
Oregon Coast (9)
Outdoor Recreation (36)
Partner Event (6)
Party (2)
Photo Contest (8)
Presentation (3)
Private land (1)
Report/Backgrounder (4)
Rivers (23)
Roadless (30)
Rogue (7)
Salmon (15)
Science (19)
Siskiyou Wild Rivers (22)
Siuslaw (4)
Snowshoe (2)
Soda Mountain (4)
Southern Oregon (12)
Spotted Owl (4)
State Forests (3)
Stewardship (4)
Sustainability (4)
Video (1)
WOPR (10)
Waldo Lake (6)
Waters (27)
Wild & Scenic (7)
Wilderness (46)
Wildlife (77)
Wolves (41)
Workshop (2)
home (1)
photo contest winners (1)
 

powered by Plone | site by Groundwire